Case Summary
The plaintiff, Parvathy Venugopal, represented by her power of attorney, filed a suit against M/s Taj Glass House and its partners for recovery of an amount due. The defendants failed to appear in court, leading to an exparte hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of money was dismissed due to lack of evidence. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove her case against the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to provide evidence of any debt owed by the defendants.
The plaintiff failed to provide evidence of any debt owed by the defendants.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to provide evidence of any debt owed by the defendants.
The plaintiff failed to provide evidence of any debt owed by the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
the court is satisfied that plaintiff has failed to prove her case. Hence suit is liable to be dismissed.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parvathy Venugopal
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shigin K M
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Taj Glass House
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vattasseri Abdul Nassar
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- Father’s name not known to the plaintiff
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Neerulpan Fathima
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- Father’s name not known to the plaintiff
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Power of Attorney, True copy Lawyer notice, Acknowledgment card
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manu Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Eliswa Saritha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 38,475/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
Hence from the evidence adduced this court is satisfied that plaintiff has failed to prove her case.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the authority of the plaintiff represented by the power of attorney.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the notice sent to the defendants regarding the due payment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the notice by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the notice by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Parvathy Venugopal vs M/s Taj Glass House et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Parvathy Venugopal vs M/s Taj Glass House et al regarding realization of money