Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1006 /2024

Case between Parvathy Venugopal vs M/s Taj Glass House et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-03-11
Duration
approximately-1 year 8 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Parvathy Venugopal, represented by her power of attorney, filed a suit against M/s Taj Glass House and its partners for recovery of an amount due. The defendants failed to appear in court, leading to an exparte hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of money was dismissed due to lack of evidence. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove her case against the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to provide evidence of any debt owed by the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Parvathy Venugopal (51 years years) 252, DD Vyapar Bhavan, Kadavanthra, Kochi- 682020 Shigin K M (38 years years) 252, DD Vyapar Bhavan, Kadavanthra, Kochi- 682020

Defendants

M/s Taj Glass House (Age not specified years) Taj Building, Nilambur Road, Mancheri, Malappuram- 676121 Vattasseri Abdul Nassar (55 years years) Taj Building, Nilambur Road, Mancheri, Malappuram- 676121 Neerulpan Fathima (52 years years) Taj Building, Nilambur Road, Mancheri, Malappuram- 676121

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 38,475/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
Hence from the evidence adduced this court is satisfied that plaintiff has failed to prove her case.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the authority of the plaintiff represented by the power of attorney.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the notice sent to the defendants regarding the due payment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the notice by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the notice by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases