Case Summary
Petitioner Parambil Kareem filed a restoration petition against respondent Thayyil Sidheeq, seeking permission to pay costs to avoid dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed with cost payment condition
Case Type
Civil Case - Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed subject to the condition to pay a cost of Rs 7,000 to the respondent by the specified date, failing which the petition stands dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs 7000/- to respondents on or before 30-6-2015. Cost not paid petition stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parambil Kareem
- Relation
- Not mentioned
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thayyil Sidheeq
- Relation
- Not mentioned
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition allowed on condition to pay Rs 7,000 as cost to respondent.
Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs 7000/- to respondents on or before 30-6-2015. Cost not paid petition stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Case - Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Parambil Kareem vs Thayyil Sidheeq regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Parambil Kareem vs Thayyil Sidheeq regarding restoration petition