Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restoration Petition No. 595/2015

Case between Parambil Kareem vs Thayyil Sidheeq regarding restoration petition

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Sanu C
Order Date
2015-06-30
Duration
0 years, 5 months, 8 days
Case Closed
Tue, 06/30/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Parambil Kareem filed a restoration petition against respondent Thayyil Sidheeq, seeking permission to pay costs to avoid dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition is allowed subject to the condition to pay a cost of Rs 7,000 to the respondent by the specified date, failing which the petition stands dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed with cost payment condition
Case Type
Civil Case - Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed subject to the condition to pay a cost of Rs 7,000 to the respondent by the specified date, failing which the petition stands dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs 7000/- to respondents on or before 30-6-2015. Cost not paid petition stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Parambil Kareem
Relation
Not mentioned
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thayyil Sidheeq
Relation
Not mentioned
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition allowed on condition to pay Rs 7,000 as cost to respondent.
Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs 7000/- to respondents on or before 30-6-2015. Cost not paid petition stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Case - Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Parambil Kareem vs Thayyil Sidheeq regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Parambil Kareem vs Thayyil Sidheeq regarding restoration petition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 01/22/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/30/2015 - 12:00
From
Mon, 06/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Tue, 06/30/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kunheevi vs Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath et al regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Meleppat Muhammedkutty Master vs Kunnath Sree Prakashan regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Case - Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Pathumma et al vs Hameed et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Case - Restoration Petition Petitioner