Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restor.Ptn 679/2015

Case between Pathumma et al vs Hameed et al regarding restoration petition

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Sanu C
Order Date
2015-07-27
Duration
0 years, 5 months, 6 days
Case Code No.
679
Case Closed
Mon, 07/27/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Multiple petitioners filed a restoration petition against multiple respondents. The petition was allowed, setting aside the previous decree.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, setting aside the decree.
Judgment Favored
Petitioner
Relief Granted
Set aside the previous decree
Case Type
Civil Case - Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed, setting aside the decree.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petition allowed. Decree dated 21-1-2015 is set aside vide order in IA 679/15.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pathumma
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thithikutty @ Kunhimol
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kadeeja
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mariyumma
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rabiya
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hameed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Amina
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moideenkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Latheef
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramla
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ibrahimkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thengassery Kizhakkeveettil Iyyacha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Doulath
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahul Hameed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammedkutty KM
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
M.K. Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Advocate
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Set aside Decree
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Set aside the decree dated 21-1-2015
Evidence:
Decree dated 21-1-2015 is set aside vide order in IA 679/15.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Case - Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 02/21/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 07/27/2015 - 12:00
From
Wed, 07/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Meleppat Muhammedkutty Master vs Kunnath Sree Prakashan regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Case - Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Parambil Kareem vs Thayyil Sidheeq regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Case - Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won