Case Summary
Plaintiff filed a suit seeking an injunction against defendants to prevent them from trespassing into the plaintiff's property and attempting to occupy the house. Defendants claimed to be related to the plaintiff based on false documents.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Perpetual Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from entering the plaintiff's property and occupying the house.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence to prove ownership and entitlement to the relief sought.
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence to prove ownership and entitlement to the relief sought.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence to prove ownership and entitlement to the relief sought.
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence to prove ownership and entitlement to the relief sought.
Supporting Evidence
Ext. A1 is the document so executed. He purchased the property from Salim @ Abudhul Latheef Salim, S/o of Thalashery Abudhul Latheef.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendants are restrained by a perpetual injunction from entering the plaint schedule property and to occupy the house situated in the plaint schedule property. 2. The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pallithodi Moidutty
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o. Pallithodi Kunhalan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mini
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o. Vaithalaparamban Yahkkoob
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vaithalaparamban
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o. Chekkumoyin Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Document No. 1847/2009 of Sub Registrar Office, Kottakkal, Building Tax Receipt
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Perpetual Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restraining defendants from entering the plaint schedule property and occupying the house
Evidence:
The defendants are restrained by a perpetual injunction from entering the plaint schedule property and to occupy the house situated in the plaint schedule property.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Document No. 1847/2009 of Sub Registrar Office
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of ownership of plaint schedule property
Reference:
Document Type:
Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proving possession of the house in plaint schedule property
Reference:
Ext. A2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Trespass
Case Code
Case between Pallithodi Moidutty vs Mini et al regarding trespass and property occupation
Case Code Year
Case between Pallithodi Moidutty vs Mini et al regarding trespass and property occupation