Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 51 OF 2011

Case between Pallatt Kunhavaru et al vs Kadeeja et al regarding injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-04-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, represented by their Mukthyar Agent, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing. The power of attorney for the defendants was present.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing. The power of attorney for the defendants was present.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not present their case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff called absent, not present.

Judgment Evidence:

The court delivered the following; Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pallatt Kunhavaru
Party Age
84
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kadeeja
Party Age
66
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kadeeja
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muneer
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajeeb
Party Age
36
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arafath
Party Age
34
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suneera
Party Age
32
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. E.C. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Vipin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Suit for injunction dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pallatt Kunhavaru et al vs Kadeeja et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Pallatt Kunhavaru et al vs Kadeeja et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 04/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won