Case Summary
Palakkalakath Moosakkutty, the plaintiff, filed a suit for injunction against Saleem and Sainudheen. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for injunction due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not mentioned
Reason not mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not mentioned
Reason not mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for Injunction. The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Hence name of the plaintiff is called absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Palakkalakath Moosakkutty
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o Kunhimoideenkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saleem
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o Muhammed @ Kuchiri Master
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sainudheen
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o Muhammed @ Kuchiri Master
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunctive relief
Evidence:
The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Hence name of the plaintiff is called absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Palakkalakath Moosakkutty vs Saleem et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Palakkalakath Moosakkutty vs Saleem et al regarding Injunction