Case Summary
Palakkal Hamza, the plaintiff, filed a suit for injunction against Kunnath Saidalavi et al. However, the suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and not represented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Palakkal Hamza
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o. Saidalavi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunnath Saidalavi
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o. Saidu Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thallasseriparamabil Saidalavi
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o. Kunhippokku
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Madambath Thadathil Abdulnazar
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muthottathil Parameswaran
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o. Karappan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muthottathil Chandran
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o. Karappan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction against the defendants
Evidence:
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Palakkal Hamza vs Kunnath Saidalavi et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Palakkal Hamza vs Kunnath Saidalavi et al regarding injunction