Case Summary
The plaintiff, Padmanabhan, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants Hameed and Fathima. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default. The defendants were awarded costs.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs to defendants.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Padmanabhan
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hameed
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.P.Shereef
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Nisha.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's suit for injunction was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs to defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Padmanabhan vs Hameed et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Padmanabhan vs Hameed et al regarding Injunction