Case Summary
Plaintiffs, including an elderly woman, sought an injunction against the defendants. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their legal counsel.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and their legal counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
null
Judgment Evidence:
No formal final order is present.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pachayi Pathumma
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- D/o. Chekku
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Oorothiyil Ismayil
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o. Mossa
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Moideen Kutty
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o. Kaduvakkancheri Entheen Kutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pathumma
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o. Moideen Kutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Granted
Description:
Injunction sought by the plaintiffs was not granted due to their absence.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Unknown
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Not available
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pachayi Pathumma et al vs Moideen Kutty et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Pachayi Pathumma et al vs Moideen Kutty et al regarding injunction