Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 32/2025

Case between P. Mayadevi et al vs V.M. Santhosh regarding eviction for non-payment of rent

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P. Mayadevi and K. Sainathan Nair, as petitioners, seek the eviction of their tenant V.M. Santhosh for failing to pay rent arrears amounting to Rs. 70,000. They claim this eviction is required to accommodate their daughter who is facing health issues.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the eviction petition based on the non-payment of rent and granted the petitioners possession of the apartment within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the tenant within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Proceedings
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established their case by providing unrebutted oral testimony and evidence of rent arrears.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows:- The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

P. Mayadevi (75 years) 38/124 Elamana Jetty Road, Tripunithura Pin-682301 K. Sainathan Nair (79 years) 38/124 Elamana Jetty Road, Tripunithura Pin-682301

Defendants

V.M. Santhosh (55 years) First Floor, Srirangam Flats 38/124-B Elamana Jetty Road, Tripunithura Pin-682301

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to vacate the apartment within 30 days to accommodate the petitioners' daughter.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to recover costs from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The office copy of the lawyer notice issued to the respondent demanding payment of rent arrears and vacating the apartment.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Track Consignment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The track consignment of the registered lawyer notice issued to the respondent, establishing proof of sending the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate of Ext.A2 confirming the track consignment of the registered lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases