Case Summary
Nediyil Hamzakutty filed a suit for injunction against Laila and other defendants. The plaintiff was absent when the case was called.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 9th day of July, 2019)
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nediyil Hamzakutty
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Laila
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Eanikkutty
- Party Age
- 73
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jameela
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arifa
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Soudabi
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vipin Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Najmudheen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.P.Jamshid Rahman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit for injunction dismissed due to absence.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nediyil Hamzakutty vs Laila et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Nediyil Hamzakutty vs Laila et al regarding injunction