Case Summary
Plaintiff Nasrath Pathummu filed a suit for injunction against defendants Aboobacaker and Bushara, which was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for injunction. Today it is posted for plaintiff's evidence. Plaintiff is not present. No proper representation for the plaintiff. Hence suit is dismissed for default. (Pronounced by me in open court, this, the 25ᵗʰ day of September, 2017) MUNSIFF.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nasrath Pathummu
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- Wife of Moideenkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aboobacaker
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o Moideenkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bushara
- Relation
- W/o Aboobacker
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nasrath Pathummu vs Aboobacaker et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Nasrath Pathummu vs Aboobacaker et al regarding injunction