Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 442/2025

Case between Naseema Noohukannu vs Sayedali.K regarding conditional attachment

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-07-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Naseema Noohukannu is the petitioner seeking conditional attachment of property due to the defendant's intention to obstruct a potential decree against him. The court has ordered the defendant to furnish security for the amount specified.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court directed the defendant to furnish security for the specified amount and ordered conditional attachment of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional attachment of the petition schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court directed the defendant to furnish security for the specified amount and ordered conditional attachment of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that there is a prima facie case.

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore, the defendant/respondent is hereby directed to furnish security for Rs.1,11,100/- (Rupees One Lakh Eleven Thousand and One Hundred Only) to the satisfaction of this court within 17/07/2025 or to show cause why she should not furnish such security.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Naseema Noohukannu
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sayedali.K
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.K. Mithran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant was directed to furnish a security of Rs.1,11,100/-.
Evidence:
Therefore, the defendant/respondent is hereby directed to furnish security for Rs.1,11,100/- (Rupees One Lakh Eleven Thousand and One Hundred Only) to the satisfaction of this court within 17/07/2025 or to show cause why she should not furnish such security.
Relief Type: Conditional Attachment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court ordered conditional attachment of the property in the petition.
Evidence:
In the meantime, this court orders conditional attachment of the petition schedule property in the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court reviewed the affidavit along with other relevant records produced by the plaintiff to assess the prima facie case.
Reference:
Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered the application submitted by the plaintiff in making its decision.
Reference:
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court issued an order regarding conditional attachment and directed the defendant to furnish security.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Naseema Noohukannu vs Sayedali.K regarding conditional attachment
Case Code Year
Case between Naseema Noohukannu vs Sayedali.K regarding conditional attachment

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won