Case Summary
The petitioners include M.X. Paul P. Joseph and others, seeking compliance of a rent control order against Olive Foods, represented by Jitto Jos. The court found that the respondent has failed to comply with the previous order regarding payment of rent arrears.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to put petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building due to non-compliance with the rent payment order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order to deposit rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the order to deposit rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the order to deposit rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the order to deposit rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 6/2025 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.X. Paul P. Joseph
- Party Age
- 82
- Relation
- S/o.Late M.V. Xavier
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.X. Wellington
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- S/o.Late M.V. Xavier
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.X. Suresh
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o. Late M.V. Xavier
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.X. Rajan
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o. Late M.V. Xavier
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Antony Thomas
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o.Late M.V. Xavier
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Olive Foods
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.P. Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.A. Anoop
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.X. Paul P. Joseph et al vs Olive Foods regarding compliance of rent control orders.
Case Code Year
Case between M.X. Paul P. Joseph et al vs Olive Foods regarding compliance of rent control orders.