Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 129/2023

Case between M.X George vs Mr. Unnikrishnan regarding rent compliance

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-01-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M.X George, the petitioner, filed a rent control petition against the respondent, Mr. Unnikrishnan, for non-compliance with a prior rent order. The court determined that the respondent had not complied with the previous order and thus took action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the premises due to non-compliance with a previous rent order. Consequently, the rent control petition was closed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order and did not show sufficient cause for the default.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M.X George (58 years) Manakkal House, near Passport Office, Canal road, Panampally Nagar, Kochi -36

Defendants

Mr. Unnikrishnan (49 years) Royale Palms Apartment, Vasudeva Road, Oppo: International Stadium, Palarivattom P.O, Ernakulam, Kochi - 682025

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases