Case Summary
M.X George, the petitioner, filed a rent control petition against the respondent, Mr. Unnikrishnan, for non-compliance with a prior rent order. The court determined that the respondent had not complied with the previous order and thus took action.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the premises due to non-compliance with a previous rent order. Consequently, the rent control petition was closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order and did not show sufficient cause for the default.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order and did not show sufficient cause for the default.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order and did not show sufficient cause for the default.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order and did not show sufficient cause for the default.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of records, no documents or memo filed by the respondent to show that order has been fully complied by him and till date he has not filed any show cause.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.X George
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Unnikrishnan
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Petition under Section 27 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vijin Karthik
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.X George vs Mr. Unnikrishnan regarding rent compliance
Case Code Year
Case between M.X George vs Mr. Unnikrishnan regarding rent compliance