Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS No.112/2025

Case between Musthafa V vs Pradeep P V regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-08-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Musthafa V, a tenant, is seeking a temporary injunction against his landlord, Pradeep P V, to prevent eviction. Musthafa claims to have invested significantly in his business and alleges unlawful interference by Pradeep.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition for temporary injunction filed by Musthafa V is dismissed. Musthafa failed to provide sufficient proof of rent payments and did not establish a prima facie case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner did not prove payment of rent and failed to establish the necessity for an injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed. Interim injunction, if any, stands vacated.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Musthafa V (31 years) XV/562 C, Chembarakky, Marampilly P O, Vazhakkulam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Perumbavoor, Ernakulam, Kerala

Defendants

Pradeep P V (55 years) Pulliyil House, Chembarakky, South Vazhakkulam, Vazhakkulam, Perumbavoor – 683 105

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner sought a temporary injunction to prevent eviction.
Evidence:
The petitioner has failed to establish a prima facie case for grant of temporary injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the rental agreement between the petitioner and the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Licence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant for establishing the petitioner's business operations.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Screenshot of payment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of payment made towards electricity charges.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Screenshot of payment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of payments related to electricity charges.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Electricity bills pending payment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of unpaid electricity bills indicating irregular payment by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Dismantle notice from KSEB
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice related to disconnection due to unpaid bills.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Copy of cash receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Potential evidence related to transactions involving the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report submitted by the Advocate Commissioner as part of the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Ernakulam, Kerala
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases