Case Summary
Roby K. Skariah is the plaintiff, and Merin Paul is the defendant in this case. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to pay rent for a property, amounting to ₹4,50,000/-.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹4,50,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff ₹4,50,000/- plus interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The uncontested evidence of the plaintiff's witness proved the case for the plaintiff.
The uncontested evidence of the plaintiff's witness proved the case for the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The uncontested evidence of the plaintiff's witness proved the case for the plaintiff.
The uncontested evidence of the plaintiff's witness proved the case for the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹4,50,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Roby K. Skariah
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thresiamma Scariah
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Merin Paul
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney, Rent Deed, Office copy of Lawyer Notice, Postal Acknowledgment Card
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mathews K. Philip
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Minisha K. Das
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shaji Thankappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Subin K. Sudheer
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajay Gopal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Amal Baby
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nandu Krishna D
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹4,50,000/- with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹4,50,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the authority of the plaintiff's representative in court.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Rent Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was relevant to demonstrate the rental agreement between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicated that the defendant was notified regarding the claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided evidence of communication regarding the notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Roby K. Skariah vs Merin Paul regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Roby K. Skariah vs Merin Paul regarding realisation of money