Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 977/2024

Case between Dr. Radha Devi vs Sri. Sunil Kumar C.S regarding realisation of money

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Dr. Radha Devi, is seeking recovery of overdue rent from the defendant, Sri. Sunil Kumar C.S, for a leased property. The case involves claims of unpaid rent and interest over a period.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has ruled in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay an amount of ₹8,19,571/- along with interest for unpaid rent. The court also granted the plaintiff the right to recover costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹8,19,571/- with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the evidence presented by the plaintiff was credible and proved the claims of unpaid rent.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹8,19,571/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Dr. Radha Devi (67 years years) Thekkekarayil House, Lisie Hospital Road, Ernakulam North P.O, Ernakulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Kochi - 682 018 Dr. Vasanthy P (57 years years) Remani Nivas, Lisie Hospital Road, Kochi - 682 018

Defendants

Sri. Sunil Kumar C.S (49 years years) Cherichiparambil House, Vennala P.O, Kochi 682 028

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹8,19,571/- from the defendant with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹8,19,571/- from the defendant as on date of suit.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Special Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document grants authority to Dr. Vasanthy P to represent the plaintiff in court.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of the judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a certified copy of the judgment in the prior case O.S 547/2015 involving the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This was the cheque issued by the defendant that was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides confirmation of the cheque's return due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified copy of deposition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is a certified copy of the testimony given by PW1 in the earlier case O.S 547/2015.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of the judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a certified copy of the judgment in the prior case O.S 1143/2018 involving the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of the judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a certified copy of the judgment in RCA No. 32/2024.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases