Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 39/2021

Case between Muraleedharan M.K. vs Baby Paily regarding landlord-tenant dispute

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-09-25
Duration
approximately-3 years 7 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Muraleedharan M.K., seeks possession of a rented property from the respondent, Baby Paily, due to non-payment of rent and the building being unoccupied. The court examined the claims based on the evidence provided by the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for possession of the rented building based on the evidence of non-payment of rent and the petitioner's genuine need for the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for possession of the rented building based on the evidence of non-payment of rent and the petitioner's genuine need for the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted oral testimony and submitted evidence established the petitioner's genuine need for the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebutted oral testimony and submitted evidence established the petitioner's genuine need for the property.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 and A4 established his case as pleaded by him. The bonafide need was projected by the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed u/s 11(3) of the Act as follows: 1.The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muraleedharan M.K.
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baby Paily
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original rent agreement dated 11.02.2009, Original notice dated 23.01.2021.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Varghese C. Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Susanth shaji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ranimol M.T.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(3) of the Act as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to realize costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to realize costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original rent agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document established the rental terms between the petitioner and the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was served on the petitioner and was accepted as evidence in support of the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Muraleedharan M.K. vs Baby Paily regarding landlord-tenant dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Muraleedharan M.K. vs Baby Paily regarding landlord-tenant dispute

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 02/11/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Jojo Paul vs Maya Prasanth regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. K. O. Joseph et al vs Mr. Abdul Sathar regarding non-compliance of rent order
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Rhine Biogenics (P) Ltd vs Century Associates regarding eviction and rent arrears
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won