Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 39/2021

Case between Muraleedharan M.K. vs Baby Paily regarding landlord-tenant dispute

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-09-25
Duration
approximately-3 years 7 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Muraleedharan M.K., seeks possession of a rented property from the respondent, Baby Paily, due to non-payment of rent and the building being unoccupied. The court examined the claims based on the evidence provided by the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for possession of the rented building based on the evidence of non-payment of rent and the petitioner's genuine need for the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted oral testimony and submitted evidence established the petitioner's genuine need for the property.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed u/s 11(3) of the Act as follows: 1.The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muraleedharan M.K. (58 years) Mancheril House, Eroor Desom, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk.

Defendants

Baby Paily (Age not specified years) Methara House, Ayambili Kavu Road, Labour Junction, Eroor Desom, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(3) of the Act as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to realize costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to realize costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original rent agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document established the rental terms between the petitioner and the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was served on the petitioner and was accepted as evidence in support of the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 02/11/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases