Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 30/2019

Case between Mujeeb Rahman vs Sudha T.S et al regarding eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-02-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Mujeeb Rahman seeking eviction of Sudha T.S and Ayshabeevi under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The plaintiff has chosen not to press the rent control petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

ORDER IN RCP: 30/2019 Dated : 23.02.2024, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mujeeb Rahman
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudha T.S
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ayshabeevi
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Control Petition, Vakalath
Defendants Documents
Vakkalath, Petition

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anand. S.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Pramod Kumar. M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Maya Chandran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil Kumar Kallissery
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Frijo. K. Sundaram
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Hirusheekesan. S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Soloman Baby
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The plaintiff is not pressing the rent control petition.
Evidence:
He filed a memo stating that he is not pressing the rent control petition. Heard in the light of above memo, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mujeeb Rahman vs Sudha T.S et al regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Mujeeb Rahman vs Sudha T.S et al regarding eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown