Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 118 OF 2019

Case between Mujeeb Rahman vs Shahinumon regarding recovery of borrowed money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-10-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mujeeb Rahman, is seeking to recover a total of ₹9,60,000 from the defendant, Shahinumon, who borrowed amounts for business expansion but failed to repay. The case arose after a cheque issued by the defendant was returned due to insufficient funds.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹9,60,000 along with interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit until realization. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹9,60,000 with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his case by providing cogent and reliable evidence, supported by the return memo of the cheque.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹9,60,000 (Rupees Nine Lakhs Sixty Thousand only) with interest @ 12% per annum thereon from the date of suit till realization, to the plaintiff. 2. Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mujeeb Rahman (39 Years years) Mannuparambil House, Tirunnavaya amsom, Karathur desom, PO. Kodakkal, Tirur Taluk, 676 108

Defendants

Shahinumon (41 Years years) Parangath House, Beeranchira, Thirunnavaya amsom, Karathur desom, PO. Kodakkal, Tirur Taluk, PIN 676 108

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Claim for recovery of amount due from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the defendant to discharge liability.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned as unpaid due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demand for payment sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement related to the amount borrowed.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified Copy of Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Official copy of the agreement dated 16.07.2014.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Mon, 10/28/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases