Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 404 of 2013

Case between Dharman.K.P. vs Thandalam Valappil Sakkariya regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-10-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Dharman.K.P., a newspaper agent, claims that the defendant, Thandalam Valappil Sakkariya, borrowed Rs. 3,00,000 and executed a promissory note to repay the amount. The defendant denies signing the note, alleging it is forged.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 4,06,817 with interest and costs of the suit. The plaintiff proved the execution of the promissory note.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay Rs. 4,06,817 with interest @ 12% per annum and costs of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the execution of the promissory note and the defendant's liability to pay.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: Defendant is directed to pay Rs.4,06,817/- (Rupees Four Lakh Six Thousand Eight Hundred and Seventeen only) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till its realization, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Dharman.K.P. (49 years years) Aramughan, Purathur amsom, desom & Post Padinharekkara, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 562 Vijayan Tharayil (49 years years) Tharayil House, Purathoor amsom, desom, Padinharekkara, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Thandalam Valappil Sakkariya (47 years years) Vettom amsom, Padiyam desom, Post Koottayi, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 568

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover Rs.4,06,817/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed to pay Rs.4,06,817/- ( Rupees Four Lakh Six Thousand Eight Hundred and Seventeen only) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till its realization, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Hence the plaintiff is entitled to realise the cost of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff to acknowledge the loan amount of Rs.3,00,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the defendant as repayment for the loan amount which was returned as unpaid.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that the cheque issued by the defendant was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents demonstrating the financial capacity of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4 to A9
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of plaintiff's identity.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Renewed proof of plaintiff's identity.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Certificates from Malayala Manorama
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's business credentials.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Certificates from Mathrubhumi
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's business credentials.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Registration Certificate of Vehicle
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves ownership and financial capacity of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Registration Certificate of Vehicle
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves ownership and financial capacity of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates further financial interests of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates further financial interests of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Letter from Malabar Land Promoters Limited Liability Partnership
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant financial correspondence concerning the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Pass Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows financial transactions related to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A19
Document Type: Share Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the plaintiff's financial investments.
Reference:
Ext.A20
Document Type: Expert Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided expert analysis regarding signatures pertinent for the forgery claims.
Reference:
Ext.X1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases