Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO.241 OF 2016

Case between K. Sethumadahavan vs K.P. Chandran regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V., B.A, LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-02-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, K. Sethumadahavan, is seeking repayment of Rs. 1,60,000/- from the defendant, K.P. Chandran, which was lent in 2015. The defendant failed to repay the amount as promised, leading to this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff Rs. 1,60,000/- along with interest and the costs of the suit. The plaintiff proved his case as the defendant remained ex parte.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,60,000/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his case by adducng cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows :- 1. Defendant is hereby directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,60,000/- with interest at rate of 12% per annum from 17-07-2015 till today and thereafter 6% per annum till realisation to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

K. Sethumadahavan (64 years years) Kalavankode House, Purathoor amsom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

K.P. Chandran (57 years years) Kaliyath Parambil House, Purathur amsom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is hereby directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,60,000/- with interest at rate of 12% per annum from 17-07-2015 till today.
Evidence:
Defendant is hereby directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,60,000/- with interest at rate of 12% per annum from 17-07-2015 till today and thereafter 6% per annum till realisation to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant executed a promissory note in favor of the plaintiff promising to repay the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases