Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO.241 OF 2016

Case between K. Sethumadahavan vs K.P. Chandran regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V., B.A, LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-02-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, K. Sethumadahavan, is seeking repayment of Rs. 1,60,000/- from the defendant, K.P. Chandran, which was lent in 2015. The defendant failed to repay the amount as promised, leading to this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff Rs. 1,60,000/- along with interest and the costs of the suit. The plaintiff proved his case as the defendant remained ex parte.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,60,000/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff Rs. 1,60,000/- along with interest and the costs of the suit. The plaintiff proved his case as the defendant remained ex parte.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his case by adducng cogent and reliable evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I find no reason to disbelieve the plaintiff. So, the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows :- 1. Defendant is hereby directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,60,000/- with interest at rate of 12% per annum from 17-07-2015 till today and thereafter 6% per annum till realisation to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. Sethumadahavan
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.P. Chandran
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Promissory Note dated 17-07-2015.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Gopi Kadavath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is hereby directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,60,000/- with interest at rate of 12% per annum from 17-07-2015 till today.
Evidence:
Defendant is hereby directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,60,000/- with interest at rate of 12% per annum from 17-07-2015 till today and thereafter 6% per annum till realisation to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant executed a promissory note in favor of the plaintiff promising to repay the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between K. Sethumadahavan vs K.P. Chandran regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between K. Sethumadahavan vs K.P. Chandran regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd. vs Abhi.P. et al regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch, Rep. By Its Branch Manager vs Jayaprakash.M.C. et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vijaya Bank vs Prakashini regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch. vs Unnikrishnan.M., Geetha.K. regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prestige Enterprises et al vs Reneesh K.V. regarding a money suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won