Case Summary
The case involves Prestige Enterprises and its partners suing Reneesh K.V. for an unpaid amount for goods supplied. The plaintiffs provided household items worth ₹5,58,794, of which ₹5,03,546 is still owed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹5,03,546 with interest @ 12% per annum and the costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering the defendant to pay ₹5,03,546 with interest and costs. The defendant's absence resulted in a default judgment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs proved their case by providing cogent and reliable evidence, despite the defendant remaining ex parte.
Plaintiffs proved their case by providing cogent and reliable evidence, despite the defendant remaining ex parte.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiffs proved their case by providing cogent and reliable evidence, despite the defendant remaining ex parte.
Plaintiffs proved their case by providing cogent and reliable evidence, despite the defendant remaining ex parte.
Supporting Evidence
the evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW1. Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹ 5,03,546/- (Rupees Five Lakh Three Thousand Five Hundred and Forty Six only) with interest @ 12% per annum thereon from the date of suit till realization, to the plaintiff.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prestige Enterprises
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A.M.Valsala
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A.M.Vishnu
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A.M.Harsha
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Reneesh K.V.
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- Proprietor
Plaintiffs Documents
Tax Invoice series A1(a) to A1(m), Lawyer Notice A2, Postal Receipt A2(a), Postal Acknowledgment Card A2(b), Copy of Partnership Deed A3.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.Hariharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kamarudheen P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs were granted the recovery of ₹5,03,546/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs were granted the right to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Tax Invoice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court used these documents to establish the amount due from the defendant for the supplied items.
Reference:
Ext.A1 (a) to Ext.A1 (m)
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show that the plaintiffs demanded payment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court referenced this document to confirm the sending of the notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2(a)
Document Type:
Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court referred to this document to confirm that the notice was received by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2(b)
Document Type:
Partnership Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the legitimacy of the plaintiffs' partnership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Prestige Enterprises et al vs Reneesh K.V. regarding a money suit
Case Code Year
Case between Prestige Enterprises et al vs Reneesh K.V. regarding a money suit