ORIGINAL SUIT No. 314 OF 2016

Case between Muhammed vs Suhara et al regarding Suit for Injunction and demarcation of way.

Court

THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Smt.NIMMI.K.K.

Order Date

2019-01-31

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muhammed filed a suit against Suhara and others regarding an injunction and demarcation of way. The suit was decreed based on a compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

The suit was decreed as per the terms of the compromise petition. The compromise petition shall form part of the decree.

Why Plaintiff Won:

Losing Side's Weaknesses:

Supporting Evidence

The suit was decreed based on a compromise between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed as per terms of Razi and compromise petition shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed
Party Age: 61
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Suhara
Party Age: 45
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Musthafa @ Babu
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Amina
Party Age: 65
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Hamza
Party Age: 58
Relation: H/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jaseela
Party Age: 30
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.P.Praveen
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Smt.P.P.Harsha
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Suit for Injunction and demarcation of way.

Evidence: