Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 42 OF 2018

Case between Muhammed Shakkir vs K.P.Raheem regarding possession of shop room

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-20
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muhammed Shakkir filed a petition against K.P.Raheem for possession of a shop room. The petitioner claims the respondent has failed to pay the agreed license fee and has ceased to occupy the premises.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the petition, directing the respondent to vacate the shop room and pay the costs of the petition to the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the shop room to the petitioner within 2 months.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The relationship between the parties was established as landlord and tenant, supporting the petitioner's claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed with cost, as follows: 1. The respondent is hereby directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the Petitioner within 2 months from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed Shakkir (26 years years) Kunnath House, Iringavorram, Vaniyannur desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

K.P.Raheem (33 years years) Salman Manzil, Pariyapuram, Panangattoor desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the Petitioner.
Evidence:
The respondent is hereby directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the Petitioner within 2 months from today.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent shall pay the costs of the petition to the Petitioner.
Evidence:
The costs shall follow the event, hence the respondent shall pay the costs of the petition to the Petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Returned notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The returned notice was mentioned as not received by the respondent, which is part of the basis for the petition.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was referred to as the renewed agreement which established the license fee.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was indicated as the original licence agreement related to the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was mentioned as the termination notice issued to the respondent for unpaid license fees.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report was submitted by the Advocate Commissioner as part of the court's consideration.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This plan was submitted alongside the commission report for the court's review.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases