Case Summary
The case involves a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction filed by Muhammed kutty against Ponmalathodi Velayudhan Nair. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence. The court awarded costs to the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and not represented in court.
The plaintiff was absent and not represented in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and not represented in court.
The plaintiff was absent and not represented in court.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff's counsel reported no instruction. Plaintiff called absent, not represented.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed kutty
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ponmalathodi Velayudhan Nair
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vipin.K.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.C.Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed kutty vs Ponmalathodi Velayudhan Nair regarding permanent prohibitory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed kutty vs Ponmalathodi Velayudhan Nair regarding permanent prohibitory Injunction