Case Summary
Muhammad Kutty filed a restoration petition against Moideen Kuty seeking relief. The court allowed the petition based on lack of sufficient reasons and documents supporting the contention.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition of Muhammad Kutty after finding lack of sufficient reasons and supporting documents.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Since no sufficient reason is stated and no document produced for supporting the contention of petition.
Judgment Evidence:
Since no sufficient reason is stated and no document produced for supporting the contention of petition. This IA stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs.2500/-.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammad Kutty
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Moideen Kuty
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M. .Vijayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Moideen Kuty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of petition
Evidence:
Since no sufficient reason is stated and no document produced for supporting the contention of petition.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammad Kutty vs Moideen Kuty regarding Restoration Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammad Kutty vs Moideen Kuty regarding Restoration Petition