Case Summary
M.Sathy filed a petition against V.A. Rjappan regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The parties reached a settlement through mediation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order of eviction
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The rent control petition was allowed, and the petitioner is entitled to an order of eviction.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties entered into a lawful settlement agreement.
The parties entered into a lawful settlement agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties entered into a lawful settlement agreement.
The parties entered into a lawful settlement agreement.
Supporting Evidence
This court is convinced that the parties have entered into the agreement voluntarily, terms are lawful, not opposed to public policy and signed by all the parties in the rent control petition.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the rent control petition is allowed under section 11 (2) (b) of the Act and the petitioner is entitled to an order of eviction accordingly.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.Sathy
- Party Age
- 78
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.A. Rjappan
- Party Age
- 83
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.R. Vinod Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vinu Chand
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anil Kumar C.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Silpa Gopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sajo Zacharia Andrews
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Renjith Rajan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jomy George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R. Padmaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R. Ajith Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sajeevan V.T.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Chitra N. Das
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aswin Ashok V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anjali G. Kutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to an order of eviction.
Evidence:
the rent control petition is allowed under section 11 (2) (b) of the Act and the petitioner is entitled to an order of eviction accordingly.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.Sathy vs V.A. Rjappan regarding eviction under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act
Case Code Year
Case between M.Sathy vs V.A. Rjappan regarding eviction under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement