Case Summary
The petitioner, Anil Kumar. K, is seeking to set aside the exparte decree against him. The respondent, M.S Sreekumar, has conceded that the costs have been received.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to set aside the exparte decree is allowed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the costs have been received and thus allowed the petition.
The court found that the costs have been received and thus allowed the petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the costs have been received and thus allowed the petition.
The court found that the costs have been received and thus allowed the petition.
Supporting Evidence
On the above submission, the order mentioned above is reviewed and the petition is allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
After roll call the petitioner and respondent represented. The order mentioned above is reviewed and the petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.S Sreekumar
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anil Kumar. K
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.S Ajithkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Maranad G. Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition to set aside the exparte decree is allowed.
Evidence:
the order mentioned above is reviewed and the petition is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.S Sreekumar vs Anil Kumar. K regarding setting aside exparte decree
Case Code Year
Case between M.S Sreekumar vs Anil Kumar. K regarding setting aside exparte decree