Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 269/2024

Case between M/s Purnima Papers vs Jose regarding recovery of money

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-11-30
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 months 12 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, a partnership firm, is seeking to recover an outstanding debt from the defendant, a proprietary concern, due to unpaid paper materials purchased on credit. The defendant has not made further purchases or appeared in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of ₹37,718 with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the decree amount from the defendant's assets if not paid.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant ordered to pay ₹37,718 with 12% interest per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of ₹37,718 (Rupees Thirty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Eighteen only) with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Purnima Papers (Age not specified years) 2nd floor, DD Trade Tower, Kaloor – Kadavanthra Road, Kaloor, Kochi – 682 017

Defendants

Jose (50 years years) Proprietor, Madona Offset Printers, XIV/70, 70 Kottackal Towers Shopping Complex, Thuravoor, Angamaly, Ernakulam, Pin – 683 572

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff seeks to recover an amount of ₹37,718 along with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of ₹37,718 with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: True copy of the plaintiff’s ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves the transactions between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer notice issued to the defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is evidence of the demand made to the defendant for the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 05/18/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Partnership Firm

Similar Cases