Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O. S. No.397/2019

Case between M/s. Deepam Granite Industries vs Antony Titus regarding realisation of amount for supply of materials

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-16
Duration
6 years 21 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a partnership firm, M/s. Deepam Granite Industries, suing Antony Titus for the recovery of a debt related to the supply of construction materials. The plaintiff claims that the defendant did not honor a payment agreement and that a dishonored cheque was issued.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding amount of ₹3,27,075 along with interest and costs. The court found clear evidence of the defendant's liability and the dishonor of the cheque issued for this amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff a sum of ₹3,27,075 and interest at specified rates.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff provided uncontroverted evidence proving the claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed exparte as follows: The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff a sum of ₹3,27,075 (Rupees Three Lakhs Twenty Seven Thousand and Seventy Five only). The defendant shall pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree, and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Deepam Granite Industries (Age not specified years) Kombanad P O-683555 Reji P Varghese (54 years) Areekkal Pangottu House, Kombanad P O – 683 555 Ann Mary Paul (39 years) Areekkal Pangottu House, Kombanad P O – 683 555

Defendants

Antony Titus (55 years) Chakkaraparambu, Near Vyttila, Vennala P O, Cochin

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the principal amount due.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree for the plaint amount.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest on the amount due.
Evidence:
Hence, plaintiff is entitled to interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and at 6% per annum thereafter till realisation.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit.
Relief Type: Execution
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff can proceed against the defendant's assets in case of non-payment.
Evidence:
In default of such payment, the plaintiff is at liberty to realise the decretal amount with interest and costs by proceeding against the assets of the Defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partnership Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the legal status of the plaintiff as a partnership firm.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Registration of Firm
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the registration of the plaintiff firm.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the payment made by the defendant towards the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Dishonoured Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms that the cheque issued by the defendant was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the defendant about the cheque dishonour and demand for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of sending the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Thu, 07/25/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Partnership Firm

Similar Cases