Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 646/2024

Case between M/s Zip Zoom Rexine house vs M/s Ador Welding Ltd et al regarding civil procedure

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a partnership firm, M/s Zip Zoom Rexine house, against multiple defendants including M/s Ador Welding Ltd and individuals Bastin Cherian, Alda Bastin, Cherian Sebastian, and Lissa Cherian. The case concerns a civil suit where a settlement was reached.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the terms of settlement as lawful and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise petition. The case has been concluded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the settlement were found to be lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, IA 8/25 is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise petition, IA 8/25.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Zip Zoom Rexine house (Age not specified years) 41/3031, Providence road, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 018

Defendants

M/s Ador Welding Ltd (Age not specified years) Ador House, 6, Dubash Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001, Maharashtra Bastin Cherian (32 years) 1st Floor Ans Apartment, Amulya Street, Cochin – 682 018 Alda Bastin (32 years) 1st Floor Ans Apartment, Amulya Street, Cochin – 682 018 Cherian Sebastian (75 years) 1st Floor Ans Apartment, Amulya Street, Cochin – 682 018 Lissa Cherian (65 years) 1st Floor, Ans Apartment, Amulya Street, Cochin – 682 018

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of the compromise petition.
Evidence:
Hence, IA 8/25 is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise petition, IA 8/25.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Terms
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court found the terms of the settlement lawful and not opposed to public policy, allowing IA 8/25.
Reference:
IA 8/25

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Partnership Firm

Similar Cases