Case Summary
This case involves a partnership firm, M/s Zip Zoom Rexine house, against multiple defendants including M/s Ador Welding Ltd and individuals Bastin Cherian, Alda Bastin, Cherian Sebastian, and Lissa Cherian. The case concerns a civil suit where a settlement was reached.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the terms of settlement as lawful and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise petition. The case has been concluded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the settlement were found to be lawful and not opposed to public policy.
The terms of the settlement were found to be lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the settlement were found to be lawful and not opposed to public policy.
The terms of the settlement were found to be lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Supporting Evidence
Terms found to be lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, IA 8/25 is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise petition, IA 8/25.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Zip Zoom Rexine house
- Relation
- represented by its Managing partner Aslam N.K
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Ador Welding Ltd
- Relation
- represented by its authorised signatory, S.Balaji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bastin Cherian
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o Cherian
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Alda Bastin
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- W/o Bastin Cherian
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Cherian Sebastian
- Party Age
- 75
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lissa Cherian
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o Cherian
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- AdvJinish Lal S.B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. P.Suresh Menon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of the compromise petition.
Evidence:
Hence, IA 8/25 is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise petition, IA 8/25.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Settlement Terms
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Court found the terms of the settlement lawful and not opposed to public policy, allowing IA 8/25.
Reference:
IA 8/25
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Zip Zoom Rexine house vs M/s Ador Welding Ltd et al regarding civil procedure
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Zip Zoom Rexine house vs M/s Ador Welding Ltd et al regarding civil procedure