Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 159/2024

Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-02-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries, represented by its sole proprietor Kishore R Menacherry, is seeking payment from the defendant, M/s Crystal Traders, represented by Renjith Pottenveliyil Muraleedharan, for outstanding dues resulting from the supply of electrical commodities. The defendant failed to pay the owed amount, leading to this lawsuit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed and the defendant is ordered to pay Rs.31,297/- with interest to the plaintiff. The defendant's assets will also be liable to satisfy the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.31,297/- along with interest @12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed and the defendant is ordered to pay Rs.31,297/- with interest to the plaintiff. The defendant's assets will also be liable to satisfy the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case for the amount due with unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a case for the amount due with unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and document produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.31,297/- with interest from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.31,297/-(Rupees Thirty one thousand two hundred and ninety seven only) along with interest @12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Crystal Traders
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of ledger extract of accounts
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P R Muraleedharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bharath Murali
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manu G Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.31,297 along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.31,297...
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed to pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree...
Relief Type: Cost Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Ledger Extract
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows GST receipt and supports the plaintiff's claim for recovery of the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won