Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1117/2023

Case between M/s Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jayakumar M.N regarding Suit for money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-12-21
Duration
approximately-2 years 8 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Jayakumar M.N for recovery of the amount due under an overdraft facility. The defendant failed to repay the borrowed amount despite repeated demands from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 2,10,993.38/- with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay an amount of 2,10,993.38/- with 9% interest per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 2,10,993.38/- with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 2,10,993.38/- with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager Cum Principal Officer
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayakumar M.N
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application, Request for overdraft facility, Agreement for MSME working Capital limits, Pronote for 2,00,000/-, Take delivery letter, Certified copy of statement of account, Copy of lawyer notice, Returned postal envelope
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suja R Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thresia Anu P.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.T.Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Josepaul Thottam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Benraj K.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Fathima Razak
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aiswarya Sajeev (Exparte)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the defendant to pay an amount of 2,10,993.38/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 2,10,993.38/- with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Request for overdraft facility
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement for MSME working Capital limits – CC & OD
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Loan Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the statement of account of the defendant's loan account as of 30.09.23.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned postal envelope from the lawyer's notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M/s Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jayakumar M.N regarding Suit for money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jayakumar M.N regarding Suit for money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 03/25/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Eldhose Varghese regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Leona Bags et al regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mohammed Ashique T K regarding recovery of loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UNION BANK OF INDIA vs PREETHA MOHAN regarding attachment of movables
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won