Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 782/18

Case between M/s. A.R. Wood Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs Amith Gurav regarding realization of money.

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-7 years 7 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff company, M/s. A.R. Wood Industries Pvt. Ltd., engaged in supplying timber products, claims unpaid dues from the defendant, Amith Gurav, who purchased rubber wood but failed to pay the full amount. The case proceeds exparte due to the defendant's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitled to realize ₹8,18,421 along with interest. The plaintiff proved the case without rebuttal from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.8,18,421/- together with interest at the rate of 6 % per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitled to realize ₹8,18,421 along with interest. The plaintiff proved the case without rebuttal from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved his case with sufficient evidence and filed within the limitation period.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved his case with sufficient evidence and filed within the limitation period.
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts.A1 to A12 and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiff has succeeded in proving his case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.8,18,421/- together with interest at the rate of 6 % per annum from the date of suit till the realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. A.R. Wood Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Amith Gurav
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Extract of Minutes of proceedings of Board of Directors Meeting held 01.08.2016, Tax invoices dated 21.12.2015 to 01.06.2016, Lawyer’s notice dated 11/06/2018, Postal receipt dated 11/06/2018, C Form issued by the defendant.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Hariprasad.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Raju Prasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover an amount of Rs.8,18,421/- along with interest.
Evidence:
Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to the relief as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Extract of Minutes of proceedings of Board of Directions Meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to support the plaintiff's case regarding the business transactions and agreements.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These invoices were used to substantiate the amounts due from the defendant for rubber wood purchased.
Reference:
Exts.A2 to A8
Document Type: Lawyers notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document served as evidence of communication regarding the payment demand before the suit was filed.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to verify the sending of the lawyers notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Copy of C form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirmed acceptance of goods by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Certificate filed u/S 65B of the Evidence Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate was used to support the admissibility of electronic records.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M/s. A.R. Wood Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs Amith Gurav regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. A.R. Wood Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs Amith Gurav regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Stanly John et al regarding restoration of EP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank, Kundara Branch vs Sheeja Das.S regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Reena vs Stellamma regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs Rajappanachari regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won