Case Summary
Mrs. Vineetha Premnandan filed a petition against Mr. A.G. Sebastian and Mr. M.M. Wilson for non-compliance with a rent control order. The case involves issues of rent arrears and possession of property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ordered to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the petitioner due to the respondent's failure to comply with the rent control order. The proceedings were stopped, and the petitioner was granted possession of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the prior court order regarding rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the prior court order regarding rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the prior court order regarding rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the prior court order regarding rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 2/2023 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mrs. Vineetha Premnandan
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. A.G. Sebastian
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. M.M. Wilson
- Party Age
- 55
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.S. Mohamed Usman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A.S. Benoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Priya Devi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.T. Poulose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.M.M. Najeeb khan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sidhiqual Akbar K.A.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mrs. Vineetha Premnandan vs Mr. A.G. Sebastian et al regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Mrs. Vineetha Premnandan vs Mr. A.G. Sebastian et al regarding Rent Control