Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 77/2024

Case between Mrs. Santha Sudhakaran vs Mrs. Sajitha Ibrahimkunju et al regarding rent control compliance

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-01-21
Duration
approximately-2 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mrs. Santha Sudhakaran filed a petition against Mrs. Sajitha Ibrahimkunju and Mr. Nazar regarding non-compliance with a rent control order. The court found that the respondents failed to comply with the order for payment of rent arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court stopped all further proceedings in the petition and directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building. The case was closed accordingly.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding payment of rent arrears.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mrs. Santha Sudhakaran (68 years) Sreebhavan, Anjumana Road, Padivattom Kara, Edapally P. O, Ernakulam District, Kochi - 682024

Defendants

Mrs. Sajitha Ibrahimkunju (51 years) Sulekha Manzil, Niravath Parambu, Peringala, Kunnathunadu, Ernakulam, Pin - 683 565 Mr. Nazar (55 years) Door No. 38/4181, Near Changampuzha Park, Edapally, Ernakulam District, Kochi - 682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases