Case Summary
Mrs. Santha Sudhakaran filed a petition against Mrs. Sajitha Ibrahimkunju and Mr. Nazar regarding non-compliance with a rent control order. The court found that the respondents failed to comply with the order for payment of rent arrears.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court stopped all further proceedings in the petition and directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building. The case was closed accordingly.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding payment of rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding payment of rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding payment of rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding payment of rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
The tenant becomes fully aware that unless sufficient cause has been shown for default committed, the consequence of stoppage of the proceedings and direction to put the landlord in possession would follow automatically.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mrs. Santha Sudhakaran
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. Sajitha Ibrahimkunju
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Nazar
- Party Age
- 55
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Innocent Francis Papali
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antony Joseph Mariadas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mini K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Devapal G.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abhijith C.G.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Peter P.A.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abraham K. John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Uthara Asokan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mrs. Santha Sudhakaran vs Mrs. Sajitha Ibrahimkunju et al regarding rent control compliance
Case Code Year
Case between Mrs. Santha Sudhakaran vs Mrs. Sajitha Ibrahimkunju et al regarding rent control compliance