Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 75/2021

Case between Mrs. Fouziya Mohammed Ashraf vs Bincy Saju regarding rent control petition

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-11-18
Duration
approximately-3 years 3 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by Mrs. Fouziya Mohammed Ashraf and Mohammed Ashraf against Bincy Saju regarding compliance with a prior order in a rent control petition. The court had to address the failure of the respondent to comply with the order to deposit rent arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the prior order regarding rent arrears and ruled to stop all further proceedings in the rent control petition. The respondent was directed to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order to deposit rent arrears.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mrs. Fouziya Mohammed Ashraf (65 years) PonnamPadickal House, Chandappura, Kodungallur, Thrissur District Mohammed Ashraf (73 years) PonnamPadickal House, Chandappura, Kodungallur, Thrissur District

Defendants

Bincy Saju (50 years) First Floor, Dee Bee Apartments, Vattathipadam Lane, Pipeline Road, Palarivattom- 682 025

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 08/18/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases