Case Summary
Mr. Seetharaman Embranthiri, the petitioner, filed a complaint against Mr. Johnson K.A., the respondent, under the Kerala Buildings Lease & Rent Control Act. The case focuses on the respondent's failure to comply with an order related to rent arrears.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner to be put in vacant possession of the building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the respondent must put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building due to non-compliance with the rent arrears order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Respondent failed to comply with the court order regarding rent payment.
Respondent failed to comply with the court order regarding rent payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Respondent failed to comply with the court order regarding rent payment.
Respondent failed to comply with the court order regarding rent payment.
Supporting Evidence
the respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 01/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under Section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mr. Seetharaman Embranthiri
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Johnson K.A.
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.K. Radhakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S. Sreedevi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Sabir V.A.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreerekha K.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Chithra R. Shenoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.R. Harikrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajesh Kumar T.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jijo Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abhishek Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ruthwik Krishna
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court referred to this order in the context of compliance and consequences for failure to comply.
Reference:
IA 01/2023
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mr. Seetharaman Embranthiri vs Mr. Johnson K.A. regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. Seetharaman Embranthiri vs Mr. Johnson K.A. regarding rent control petition