Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 80/2024

Case between Mr. Jacob Mathai et al vs Antony Devasia regarding lease and rent arrears

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-03-01
Duration
approximately-2 years 9 months
Case Closed
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves petitioners Mr. Jacob Mathai and others seeking eviction of respondent Antony Devasia for failure to pay rent and clear dues under a lease agreement. The petitioners claim that significant rent arrears have accumulated and the respondent has not vacated the premises despite a termination notice.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the petitioners' request, instructing the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days and ordered costs to be paid to the petitioners. The petition was allowed based on the evidence presented.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to vacate the premises and pay the costs of the petition.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the petitioners' request, instructing the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days and ordered costs to be paid to the petitioners. The petition was allowed based on the evidence presented.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence established the petitioner's entitlement to relief based on the arrears owed and their bona fide need for the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence established the petitioner's entitlement to relief based on the arrears owed and their bona fide need for the property.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 and A2 established their case as pleaded by them. It shows that the rent is in arrears. The bonafide need was also projected by the petitioners.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows:- 1.The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Jacob Mathai
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. K.M. Ziauddin
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Anwar M Haneef
Party Age
43
Relation
Representative of
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jiju Eapen
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Puthuparambil John Abraham
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony Devasia
Relation
Authorized Signatory
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Reldor Realtors Pvt Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Reldor Resource Management Pvt. Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Energion Interiors & MEP Contractors Pvt Ltd
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Lease Deed dated 11.05.2022, Copy of Lawyer's notice dated 03.01.2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renjith R. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anju Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ansil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows:- The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/ petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original lease deed dated 11.05.2022 between the parties was established to support the case of the petitioners.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The copy of lawyer's notice dated 03.01.2024 was accepted and appreciated in evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Mr. Jacob Mathai et al vs Antony Devasia regarding lease and rent arrears
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. Jacob Mathai et al vs Antony Devasia regarding lease and rent arrears

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 05/15/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Jojo Paul vs Maya Prasanth regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. K. O. Joseph et al vs Mr. Abdul Sathar regarding non-compliance of rent order
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Rhine Biogenics (P) Ltd vs Century Associates regarding eviction and rent arrears
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won