Case Summary
Plaintiff Abdul Azeez filed an injunction suit against defendants seeking relief, but the suit was dismissed due to plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for injunction due to plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
No final order provided in the judgment.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Moonnamkandathil Abdul Azeez
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Puthukayil Valappil Aalikkutty's children; 1. Rahmath, 2. Abdul Rasak, 3. Rubeena
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit for injunction dismissed with costs due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
No specific evidence provided.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Moonnamkandathil Abdul Azeez vs Puthukayil Valappil Aalikkutty's children regarding injunction suit
Case Code Year
Case between Moonnamkandathil Abdul Azeez vs Puthukayil Valappil Aalikkutty's children regarding injunction suit