Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.122/2021

Case between Mohanan vs Lekha regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-03-21
Duration
approximately-4 years 1 month 21 days
Case Code No.
122
Case Closed
Fri, 03/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the petitioner/defendant Mohanan and respondent/plaintiff Lekha regarding a money decree. The defendant contends that he was unaware of the suit leading to an exparte decree against him.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
Both petitions filed by the defendant to set aside the exparte decree were dismissed. The court found that the defendant had sufficient notice and did not provide credible reasons for the delay.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Common Order
Final Judgment
No
Both petitions filed by the defendant to set aside the exparte decree were dismissed. The court found that the defendant had sufficient notice and did not provide credible reasons for the delay.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the defendant was adequately served with notice and did not convincingly explain the delay.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
There is absolutely no materials before the Court to show that the petitioner was prevented from filing the petition to set aside the exparte decree in time.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/2024 and RP 261/2024 are dismissed with costs of the respondent/plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lekha
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohanan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Sreeraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.C.Ushadevi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Petition for condoning the delay in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree.
Evidence:
Delay is not at all explained. Hence the petition for condoning the delay is only to be dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Application to set aside the exparte decree.
Evidence:
In view of my finding on point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration. It is accordingly answered.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Common Order
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 02/10/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Joshna. J et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Lalitha Vikraman @ Lalitha vs Dr.R.Divakaran Chakravarthy regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Aswathy.V.S. et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between John Bosco vs Sajayakumar et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.Vijayan vs State of Kerala et al regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won