Original Suit No. 16 OF 2015

Case between Mohamedali et al vs Sadik et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2016-10-24
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Mon, 10/24/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs Mohamedali and Saru filed an injunction suit against defendants Sadik, Basheer, Aramughan, Thahira, Savad, and Aboobacker. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohamedali
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o. Azeez
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saru
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o. Aboobacker
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sadik
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o. Mohamedali
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Basheer
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o. Ismail
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aramughan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o. Thupran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thahira
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o. Nazer
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Savad
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o. Bappu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aboobacker
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o. Abdulla
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.K. Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Unknown
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Injunction suit dismissed for default
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohamedali et al vs Sadik et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mohamedali et al vs Sadik et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 10/24/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 10/24/2016 - 12:00
From
Sat, 10/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Mon, 10/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
0%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won