Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 01/2024

Case between M.J. Francis vs Jose Sinil regarding compliance of rent control petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-10-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M.J. Francis filed a petition against Jose Sinil for non-compliance with a previous order related to rent arrears. The court found that Jose Sinil failed to comply with the order and ruled accordingly.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the respondent, Jose Sinil, did not comply with the court order regarding rent arrears. Consequently, the petition was closed and the respondent was ordered to give possession of the building to the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the respondent, Jose Sinil, did not comply with the court order regarding rent arrears. Consequently, the petition was closed and the respondent was ordered to give possession of the building to the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Respondent failed to comply with the previous court order and did not show cause for their non-compliance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Respondent failed to comply with the previous court order and did not show cause for their non-compliance.
Supporting Evidence
In the instant case, more than one and half month has elapsed after the order has been passed. So far respondent did not complied or show cause.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.J. Francis
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jose Sinil
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.S. Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N. Sudha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Babu Shankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alvin Jewel S.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vidhya T.U.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreelakshmi B.T.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Menino Futo
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.A. Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.J. Francis vs Jose Sinil regarding compliance of rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between M.J. Francis vs Jose Sinil regarding compliance of rent control petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown