Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 22/2023

Case between Mini Baby vs Central Bank of India regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-08-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Mini Baby, filed a rent control petition against the Central Bank of India. The case was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition due to the absence of the petitioner and lack of evidence. Consequently, no costs were granted to either party.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition due to the absence of the petitioner and lack of evidence. Consequently, no costs were granted to either party.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to prove their case as they were absent and did not file necessary documents.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to prove their case as they were absent and did not file necessary documents.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner remained absent though today listed for evidence. No proof affidavit seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the rent control petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mini Baby
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Central Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Branch Manager, Central Bank of India
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. C. Paulose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Latha T. Thankappan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.T Kunjachan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Latha Susan Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George A. Cherian
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed for non prosecution due to absence of petitioner.
Evidence:
Hence the rent control petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mini Baby vs Central Bank of India regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Mini Baby vs Central Bank of India regarding Rent Control Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Central Bank of India

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown