Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 67/2024

Case between Mercy Charley vs Dhanya C. regarding eviction from rented property

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-10-25
Duration
approximately-2 years 4 months 7 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mercy Charley is the landlord seeking the eviction of Dhanya C., the tenant, who has not vacated the premises after the lease expired. The petitioner claims the respondent has been in arrears of rent and has refused to leave despite a legal notice and an eviction notice.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition is allowed, directing the respondent to vacate the premises and hand over possession to the petitioner within 30 days. The court also orders the respondent to pay the costs of the petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrefuted evidence demonstrated that the rent was in arrears and that the landlord had a bonafide need for the property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mercy Charley (61 years) H.No. 379, Polayil House, Poleparambil Lane, Mamangalam Edappally P.O., Ernakulam District, Pin-682 024

Defendants

Dhanya C. (36 years) Chettissery House, Murikkumpadam, Azheekkal P.O., Vypin, Ernakulam, Pin-682510.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to vacate the premises in favor of the petitioner.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to recover costs from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was issued by the petitioner to the respondent regarding eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice is related to the petitioner's claim for eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Legal notice with original A/D
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the petitioner's claim regarding the notice served to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending a legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certified copy of the lease agreement establishes the terms of the tenancy.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Plaint in OS 424/2022
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a certified copy of the plaint that was filed by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Plaint in OS 890/2022
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a certified copy of the plaint that was filed by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: FIR
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the filing of FIR related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Oral testimony of the petitioner supporting her claims.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 07/18/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases