Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.3026 OF 2017

Case between Melethil Kunhimuhammed et al vs Korath Thazhathethil Musthafa regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-02-19
Duration
5 years
Case Closed
Sun, 12/31/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners, defendants in an injunction suit, filed to set aside an ex parte order due to absence during trial citing illness. Respondent objected citing delay and motive to drag the case.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petitioners' application was granted with a cost order of Rs.6,000 payable to the respondent by a specified date.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Cost of Rs.6,000 payable to respondent by 09-03-2018
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The petitioners' application was granted with a cost order of Rs.6,000 payable to the respondent by a specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The delay in filing the petition was condoned, and the court found it appropriate to allow the application with the condition of paying the cost to the respondent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The delay in filing the petition was condoned, and the court found it appropriate to allow the application with the condition of paying the cost to the respondent.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent thus requests to dismiss the petition. As stated above, this is an application filed by the petitioners for setting aside the decree.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.6,000 by the petitioners to the respondent.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Melethil Kunhimuhammed
Party Age
55
Relation
Son of Moitheen
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Korath Thazhathethil Musthafa
Party Age
49
Relation
Son of Kunhahammed Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Mehroof Shihab
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.A. Padmakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Cost of Rs.6,000 payable to respondent by 09-03-2018
Evidence:
The petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.6,000 by the petitioners to the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Melethil Kunhimuhammed et al vs Korath Thazhathethil Musthafa regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Melethil Kunhimuhammed et al vs Korath Thazhathethil Musthafa regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sun, 12/31/2017 - 12:00
From
Thu, 02/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Wed, 02/28/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won