Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST.No. 116/2023

Case between Maya Shereen vs Jayakumar regarding dishonour of cheque

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-V, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Sofia. T.A
Order Date
2025-09-19
Duration
approximately-6 years 2 months 19 days
Case Code No.
116
Case Closed
Fri, 09/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Maya Shereen filed a complaint against Jayakumar for dishonouring a cheque issued for the repayment of a loan. The court found the accused not guilty.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The accused was found not guilty of the offence of dishonouring the cheque issued under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was found not guilty of the offence of dishonouring the cheque issued under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant failed to comply with the statutory requirements under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant failed to comply with the statutory requirements under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant failed to prove the initial burden.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is found not guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and hence he is acquitted under Section 255(1) of CrPC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Maya Shereen
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayakumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque bearing No.189842 dated 30/04/2019, Copy of Cheque Return memo dated 14/06/2019, Office Copy of Advocate Notice dated 11/07/2019, Postal receipt dated 11/07/2019, Unserved postal articles
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.G. Vijayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Krishna S. Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque is the subject of the allegations regarding dishonour due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document shows the dishonour of the cheque due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This was the legal notice sent to the accused demanding payment for the dishonoured cheque.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The receipt evidences the sending of the legal notice to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Unserved postal articles
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document demonstrates that the legal notice was not served to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P5

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 09/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jamaludeen K.P. vs A. Mani regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-V, Kollam
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanavas vs Sunil Lal regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS – V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Kishore vs Lathika Kumari regarding offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between T.S. Pradeep vs Suni Lal regarding Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS – V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between R. Sreekumar vs Smt. Kavitha Venkideswaran regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class – V, Kollam
Criminal Case Defendant Won