Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 103/2024

Case between Mathew Tharian et al vs Weespaces Pvt.Ltd. et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-05-19
Duration
approximately-1 year 9 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Mathew Tharian and Santhi Mathew, are seeking possession of a rented property from the respondents, Weespaces Pvt.Ltd. and Sankesh Sreenivas, due to default in rent payment. The second petitioner requires the property for her architectural office.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, directing the respondents to vacate the property within 30 days. The petitioners are also entitled to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Possession of the petition schedule building and costs
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established their case and demonstrated the bonafide need for the premises.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed under Section 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows:- The respondents/tenants are directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mathew Tharian (45 years) G-307, Panampilly Nagar, Kochi 682 036 Santhi Mathew (40 years) G-307, Panampilly Nagar, Kochi 682 036

Defendants

Weespaces Pvt.Ltd. (null years) Krishna, Wayanad Road, East Nadakavur, Calicut 673 011 Sankesh Sreenivas (42 years) Krishna, Wayanad Road, East Nadakavur, Calicut 673 011

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under Section 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows:- The respondents/tenants are directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Cost Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioners are entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondents.
Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondents.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the authority of the second petitioner to represent in legal matters.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the lease terms between petitioners and respondents, though it was rejected due to lack of foundational evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 08/16/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases